Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,879
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $124,599,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Robertson Planting | Indianola, MS 38751 | $323,396 |
42 | Myers Farm | Dundee, MS 38626 | $311,931 |
43 | Canon Farms | Tunica, MS 38676 | $307,919 |
44 | Maxwell Farms | Benoit, MS 38725 | $305,725 |
45 | Huddleston Planting Co | Greenville, MS 38701 | $302,158 |
46 | Griffin Farms South | Helena, AR 72342 | $300,400 |
47 | Anderson Planting Co II | Inverness, MS 38753 | $294,319 |
48 | Little Omega Farms | Tchula, MS 39169 | $288,693 |
49 | Bank Of Missouri ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $285,512 |
50 | Aguzzi Farms A Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $283,830 |
51 | Simmons Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $282,421 |
52 | G & G Farms No 2 | Shaw, MS 38773 | $269,198 |
53 | Opossum Ridge Planting Co | Hollandale, MS 38748 | $263,755 |
54 | Braswell Enterprises | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $263,152 |
55 | Capstone Partners | Scott, MS 38772 | $256,445 |
56 | Coghlan & Sons | Holly Bluff, MS 39088 | $256,182 |
57 | Dixie Farms | Vance, MS 38964 | $252,152 |
58 | Business First Bank ** | Houma, LA 70360 | $249,258 |
59 | Hunter Planting Co | Grace, MS 38745 | $248,338 |
60 | Egypt Planting Company III | Cruger, MS 38924 | $245,809 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”