Market Loss Assistance Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 5,972
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $343,259,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Carter Plantation Limited | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $626,590 |
62 | Hollywood Planting Company | Tunica, MS 38676 | $622,760 |
63 | Crawford Farms Ajv II | Lambert, MS 38643 | $619,316 |
64 | Peboca Hairston Partnership | Silver City, MS 39166 | $617,376 |
65 | Gypsy Farms | Greenville, MS 38703 | $617,076 |
66 | Braswell Enterprises | Belzoni, MS 39038 | $607,637 |
67 | Stonewall Plantation Joint Venture | Osceola, AR 72370 | $599,955 |
68 | Pittman & Co Farms | Marks, MS 38646 | $598,870 |
69 | Buckshot Farms | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $598,177 |
70 | Legg Farms II | Drew, MS 38737 | $597,526 |
71 | Riverbend Farms | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $594,760 |
72 | Esperanza Planting Co | Glen Allan, MS 38744 | $591,105 |
73 | Mont Helena Associates | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $587,830 |
74 | Boone Farms 3 | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $587,325 |
75 | Fratesi Planting Co Partnership | Leland, MS 38756 | $584,668 |
76 | Tim Lusk & Associates | Fulton, KY 42041 | $563,677 |
77 | Phillips Planting Company LLC | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $562,526 |
78 | Walter Pillow & Sons Planting Co | Greenwood, MS 38930 | $556,700 |
79 | M & M Planting Co | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $555,205 |
80 | David Caudell Farms Partnership | Tutwiler, MS 38963 | $555,183 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”