Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 442

Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $17,060,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments
1995-2023
1Bbf PartnershipCalhoun City, MS 38916$413,256
2Twin Ridge Farms Partnership IICleveland, MS 38732$329,672
3H&h Farms LLC Dba Hughes&hughes Farms LLCBenoit, MS 38725$306,882
4Patrick SmithGreenville, MS 38703$270,747
5Seward & Son Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$264,221
6Canton Mart Farms PartnershipCleveland, MS 38732$250,233
7Jason & Kathy Lineberry PtrsFinley, TN 38030$249,754
8Delta AgComo, MS 38619$234,370
9Scott FarmsItta Bena, MS 38941$222,924
10Lakeside Planting CompanySidon, MS 38954$210,422
11Mark B DillNeosho Rapids, KS 66864$206,565
12Jls Farms PartnershipGreenville, MS 38703$205,593
13Shipland FarmsRolling Fork, MS 39159$185,874
14Cypress Brake Planting CompanyTunica, MS 38676$178,786
15Citizens Bank & Trust Co **Marks, MS 38646$178,781
16Michael P Martin FarmsGreenwood, MS 38930$173,899
17Jordan Planting CompanyYazoo City, MS 39194$166,090
18Btt LLCLeland, MS 38756$163,987
193 County FarmsRuleville, MS 38771$155,893
20Mike Theunissen Farms IncHollandale, MS 38748$144,082

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag