Counter Cyclical Program in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 6,511

Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 2nd District of Mississippi (Rep. Bennie Thompson) totaled $712,327,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Counter Cyclical Program
1995-2023
21St Rest Planting CoIndianola, MS 38751$2,421,538
22Martin FarmsAnguilla, MS 38721$2,414,400
23Bowdre PlaceRobinsonville, MS 38664$2,371,145
24Hard Cash Planting CompanyIndianola, MS 38751$2,366,439
25Gypsy FarmsGreenville, MS 38703$2,334,065
26Norway Farms IIYazoo City, MS 39194$2,327,266
27Flautt FarmsWebb, MS 38966$2,309,427
28Seward & Harris Planting CompanyLouise, MS 39097$2,256,930
29Maxwell FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$2,224,153
30Gum Grove Planting CoYazoo City, MS 39194$2,162,132
31Egremont-baconia FarmsCary, MS 39054$2,010,637
32Mont Helena AssociatesRolling Fork, MS 39159$2,002,657
33Hampton Lake FarmGlendora, MS 38928$1,987,071
34Lynndale PartnersRolling Fork, MS 39159$1,983,423
35Valley Planting CompanySatartia, MS 39162$1,963,201
36Fewell Planting CompanyVance, MS 38964$1,957,863
37G M FarmsRolling Fork, MS 39159$1,912,363
38Jordan Planting CompanyYazoo City, MS 39194$1,902,562
39Coghlan FarmsBenoit, MS 38725$1,900,191
40Omega PlantationsLyon, MS 38645$1,877,803

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag