Production Flexibility Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 5,160

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $101,735,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
41Marion L Pridgen Farms IncWilson, NC 27894$242,459
42Wilson Farms IncScotland Neck, NC 27874$242,371
43Jake Taylor Farms IncBradenton, FL 34203$240,439
44Elouise A RespassPlymouth, NC 27962$234,375
45Heber Lemmie Respass JrPlymouth, NC 27962$234,371
46Hyman Farms IncTarboro, NC 27886$234,311
47Don M Anderson Farms IncTarboro, NC 27886$234,198
48Ricky Sorie FarmsNashville, NC 27856$229,926
49Killebrew BrothersRocky Mount, NC 27801$227,656
50Gillam Farming IncWindsor, NC 27983$227,642
51L Hodge Kitchin IIIScotland Neck, NC 27874$226,986
52Bruce L Flye & Randall Flye PtrBattleboro, NC 27809$226,740
53Jrk Farms LLCScotland Neck, NC 27874$226,119
54Manning Brothers Farms IncPantego, NC 27860$225,577
55Cypress Glade FarmsCorapeake, NC 27926$224,801
56R C Hux JrScotland Neck, NC 27874$222,821
57Cobb Farms IncWindsor, NC 27983$221,184
58Clark Industries IncTarboro, NC 27886$220,448
59Elliott Farms IncRoper, NC 27970$218,116
60Silas E SmithRocky Mount, NC 27801$217,890

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag