Total Subsidies in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 30,023

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $1,809,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
61Charles D HaleScotland Neck, NC 27874$3,100,709
62Buckhorn FarmsScotland Neck, NC 27874$3,070,900
63Sharp Farms IncSims, NC 27880$3,049,667
64Copeland FarmsScotland Neck, NC 27874$3,011,448
65Grant Staton Farms IncScotland Neck, NC 27874$3,009,674
66A N Dickens JrHalifax, NC 27839$2,999,395
67Wayne Edwards FarmsWhitakers, NC 27891$2,975,657
68James Benjamin HarrisPendleton, NC 27862$2,953,958
69Harden Farms IncWindsor, NC 27983$2,926,937
70Elizabeth H FosterGreenville, NC 27834$2,916,360
71W S Clark FarmsTarboro, NC 27886$2,895,516
72Pike BrothersLittleton, NC 27850$2,892,568
73Hedgepeth FarmsHalifax, NC 27839$2,887,880
74Ricky Sorie FarmsNashville, NC 27856$2,886,593
75Todd Glover Farms IncWilson, NC 27896$2,882,685
76Drewette & FlytheJackson, NC 27845$2,869,703
77Chris A Braddy Farms IncScotland Neck, NC 27874$2,856,551
78William R JohnstonJackson, NC 27845$2,815,338
79Dennis Ray RiddickHobbsville, NC 27946$2,802,981
80Pike Family Farms PartnershipLittleton, NC 27850$2,741,502

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag