Production Flexibility Program in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,160

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $101,735,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
21Berry Pittman JrTarboro, NC 27886$268,190
22Stephenson BrosGarysburg, NC 27831$268,064
23W A Pierce IIIWeldon, NC 27890$264,124
24Tar River Valley CoSpring Hope, NC 27882$262,604
25Harris FarmsRoper, NC 27970$262,313
26Joel M BosemanBattleboro, NC 27809$261,569
27Jean J BosemanBattleboro, NC 27809$261,421
28Jack H Winslow Fms IncScotland Neck, NC 27874$259,112
29Morell Jones FarmsEnfield, NC 27823$258,750
30Earl AdkinsEnfield, NC 27823$257,310
31Byrum Farm Service Center IncAhoskie, NC 27910$256,831
32Copeland FarmsScotland Neck, NC 27874$256,342
33Jerry Hamill Farms IncEnfield, NC 27823$254,577
34Spruill Farms IncWindsor, NC 27983$253,884
35Bobby Eubanks Farms IncWindsor, NC 27983$252,701
36William R JohnstonJackson, NC 27845$251,611
37Chris A Braddy Farms IncScotland Neck, NC 27874$250,635
38Daniels Bros IncMerry Hill, NC 27957$248,014
39Urquhart Farms IncLewiston Woodville, NC 27849$247,465
40Dennis TrotmanHobbsville, NC 27946$244,410

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag