Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 28,417

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of North Carolina (Rep. G.K. Butterfield) totaled $1,503,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
21Urquhart Farms IncLewiston Woodville, NC 27849$4,580,859
22Rock Ridge Farm PartnershipWilson, NC 27893$4,515,285
23Miller PartnershipGatesville, NC 27938$4,468,781
24Brinkley Farms IncAulander, NC 27805$4,411,046
25Lancaster PropertiesStantonsburg, NC 27883$4,385,552
26Scott Farms IncLucama, NC 27851$4,365,862
27Whitehurst Farms PtnsConetoe, NC 27819$4,165,919
28Evans Brothers PartnershipTarboro, NC 27886$3,943,789
29H & H FarmsComo, NC 27818$3,930,718
30Byrum Farm Service Center IncAhoskie, NC 27910$3,913,929
31Latros FarmsEnfield, NC 27823$3,885,890
32Morell Jones FarmsEnfield, NC 27823$3,866,304
33Mush Island FarmsRoanoke Rapids, NC 27870$3,790,919
34Griffin Farming PartnershipLewiston, NC 27849$3,786,837
35Marion L Pridgen Farms IncWilson, NC 27894$3,683,720
36Fisher Farms PartnershipWhitakers, NC 27891$3,574,281
37Rest-a-bit FarmsPinetops, NC 27864$3,572,798
38Williford Farms IncWindsor, NC 27983$3,563,351
39John R Grimes Jr FarmsBattleboro, NC 27809$3,342,876
40Flythe FarmsSeaboard, NC 27876$3,213,572

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag