Cotton Ginning Program in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 82
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $1,381,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | G & R Farms Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $113,774 |
2 | John C Melvin | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $78,575 |
3 | Susan M Melvin | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $78,575 |
4 | Kevin Jacob Lee | Dunn, NC 28334 | $77,089 |
5 | Wf Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $64,805 |
6 | Derek J Godwin Farms | Dunn, NC 28334 | $61,472 |
7 | Woodrow W Marlowe Jr | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $60,888 |
8 | Arthur Cale Lee | Dunn, NC 28334 | $55,381 |
9 | John Herbert Cox | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $51,947 |
10 | Carr Farms | Clinton, NC 28328 | $51,098 |
11 | Ten Mile Farm Inc | Faison, NC 28341 | $50,250 |
12 | Jernigan Farms Inc | Dunn, NC 28334 | $34,293 |
13 | John Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $28,459 |
14 | David G Godwin Farms Inc | Dunn, NC 28334 | $25,442 |
15 | Jim Stanaland | Ash, NC 28420 | $24,802 |
16 | Matthew D West | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $22,914 |
17 | David Ellis Jordan | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $22,662 |
18 | Gerald Ray Jackson | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $20,442 |
19 | Bobby Ray Jackson | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $19,509 |
20 | Fann Farms | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $19,472 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>