Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 503
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 7th District of North Carolina (Rep. David Rouzer) totaled $9,232,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Prestage Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28329 | $750,000 |
2 | Bobcat Farms LLC | Clinton, NC 28329 | $659,288 |
3 | Ernest Smith Farms Inc | Garland, NC 28441 | $605,441 |
4 | Kooba Dairy Inc | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $500,000 |
5 | Shw Sow Farm LLC | Smithfield, NC 27577 | $455,385 |
6 | Hidden Creek Farms, LLC | Dunn, NC 28334 | $352,254 |
7 | Howard Brothers Farms LLC | Autryville, NC 28318 | $281,002 |
8 | Triple M Incorporated | Clinton, NC 28328 | $250,000 |
9 | Wade Stanaland | Bladenboro, NC 28320 | $250,000 |
10 | Jeffrey W Kamp Dba Ksm | Clinton, NC 28328 | $229,604 |
11 | G & R Farms Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $142,754 |
12 | Bad Branch LLC | Clinton, NC 28329 | $136,000 |
13 | Kevin Jacob Lee | Dunn, NC 28334 | $127,053 |
14 | Woodrow W Marlowe Jr | Clarkton, NC 28433 | $123,880 |
15 | Wf Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $119,349 |
16 | Buddy Dewayne Mcpherson | Tabor City, NC 28463 | $111,778 |
17 | Zack Mccullen III | Clinton, NC 28328 | $94,122 |
18 | J Michael Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $87,162 |
19 | Ten Mile Farm Inc | Faison, NC 28341 | $82,115 |
20 | Floramark Inc D/b/a Castle Hayne Farms | Castle Hayne, NC 28429 | $71,515 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>