Counter Cyclical Program in 8th District of North Carolina (Rep. Richard Hudson), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 130
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 8th District of North Carolina (Rep. Richard Hudson) totaled $388,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John A Walker | Concord, NC 28025 | $753 |
42 | Ray J Walker | Concord, NC 28025 | $753 |
43 | Bruce L Furr | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $724 |
44 | L Pearl Wagoner | Gold Hill, NC 28071 | $640 |
45 | Ludmilla C Breckner | Concord, NC 28025 | $637 |
46 | Hal E Little | Midland, NC 28107 | $604 |
47 | Callie Barrier | Concord, NC 28025 | $574 |
48 | Mildred R Smith | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $569 |
49 | Carol F Carter | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $559 |
50 | Neal Vannoy Mcglamery Jr | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $508 |
51 | Kenneth P Furr | Concord, NC 28025 | $453 |
52 | Herbert H Fisher | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $450 |
53 | Ellen Marie Almond | Kannapolis, NC 28081 | $448 |
54 | Lester L Wilkinson | Mooresville, NC 28115 | $448 |
55 | Tony R Bonds | Concord, NC 28027 | $446 |
56 | Carl Pless | Rockwell, NC 28138 | $442 |
57 | Marshall L Swaringen | Salisbury, NC 28146 | $441 |
58 | Gary W Barrier | Mount Pleasant, NC 28124 | $426 |
59 | Samuel Christopher Johnson | Harrisburg, NC 28075 | $386 |
60 | James A Tucker | Monroe, NC 28110 | $373 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”