Farm Subsidy information
9th District of North Carolina
(Open Seat)
Total Subsidies in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 9,635
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $383,768,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gary Powers Farms | Lumberton, NC 28360 | $1,067,603 |
82 | Billy Franklin Lee | Norwood, NC 28128 | $1,066,592 |
83 | John M Buie | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $1,066,354 |
84 | Henry H Locklear Jr | Maxton, NC 28364 | $1,060,005 |
85 | Edens & Autry Inc | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $1,049,790 |
86 | Monroe Farms | Raeford, NC 28376 | $1,044,587 |
87 | Shooter Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $1,032,321 |
88 | Keith Adcox | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $1,021,109 |
89 | Robert W Lewis | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $999,748 |
90 | Michael L Davis | Rowland, NC 28383 | $991,832 |
91 | Joseph Richard Bruce | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $987,715 |
92 | Forbis Farms Inc | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $982,775 |
93 | James D Mcgougan Estate | Lumber Bridge, NC 28357 | $979,424 |
94 | Telford H Hunt & Sons | Fairmont, NC 28340 | $976,947 |
95 | Larry Smith | Lumberton, NC 28358 | $966,116 |
96 | Michael A Mccormick | Rowland, NC 28383 | $940,470 |
97 | Roy Wood Jr | Pinehurst, NC 28374 | $926,386 |
98 | Hector M Watson Jr | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $900,758 |
99 | William H Mcintyre Jr | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $891,979 |
100 | Baucom Family Farm General Partnership | Monroe, NC 28110 | $888,418 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”