Total Commodity Programs in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 8,405

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 9th District of North Carolina (Open Seat) totaled $313,360,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
21Forbis FarmsLumber Bridge, NC 28357$2,120,910
22Cecil Sikes Farm IncAnsonville, NC 28007$2,045,311
23Philip FutrellWagram, NC 28396$2,007,122
24Zeb B OxendineRowland, NC 28383$1,926,312
25Miller Farms Of Rowland IncRowland, NC 28383$1,856,866
26Rowland Farms IncRowland, NC 28383$1,850,769
27Rockdale Farms IncLaurel Hill, NC 28351$1,798,655
28Fincher L Martin Martin FarmsWadesboro, NC 28170$1,792,158
29Lee Grady LowryMaxton, NC 28364$1,757,421
30Elrod Farms IncLaurel Hill, NC 28351$1,727,141
31P & S Farms IncRowland, NC 28383$1,719,159
32Jack Leggette FarmsRowland, NC 28383$1,708,084
33Hendrix Livestock IncRaeford, NC 28376$1,653,393
34Herbert Colon Roberts IIILumberton, NC 28358$1,639,060
35Louie BodenhamerRowland, NC 28383$1,617,269
36J D Carmichael IncLaurinburg, NC 28353$1,547,731
37Hayes Brothers FarmsLumberton, NC 28358$1,527,263
38Kerry Bodenhamer Farms LLCMaxton, NC 28364$1,520,756
39Danny Walters Farms IncFairmont, NC 28340$1,501,827
40Carmichael Farms LLCLaurinburg, NC 28353$1,500,657

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag