Production Flexibility Program in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 8,712

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 1st District of Nebraska (Rep. Jeff Fortenberry) totaled $160,314,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
61Kenneth StaraRising City, NE 68658$178,006
62Mrm Farm PtnpDecatur, NE 68020$175,348
63Ratkovec FarmsWeston, NE 68070$175,166
64Fiala Farms IncDavid City, NE 68632$174,418
65Art Nitzsche JrBancroft, NE 68004$174,204
66Hansen FarmsPender, NE 68047$174,034
67Donald J MeysenburgBellwood, NE 68624$173,623
68Mjm Farms IncRichland, NE 68601$173,157
69Benjamin Michael ScholtingLouisville, NE 68037$172,338
70Joseph Dee MalloyDecatur, NE 68020$170,591
71A J Farms IncDavid City, NE 68632$169,069
72Douglas Breitkreutz SrWisner, NE 68791$168,586
73Dennis Steager Revocable TrustRising City, NE 68658$167,619
74Donald J BohuslavskyDwight, NE 68635$166,582
75R. L. R., Inc.West Point, NE 68788$166,453
76Selden Cattle CoRising City, NE 68658$165,992
77Kent VanicekYork, NE 68467$165,602
78Kratochvil BrothersUlysses, NE 68669$162,520
79Birkel Pokorny PartnershipBellwood, NE 68624$161,156
80D R M Farm LLCPlattsmouth, NE 68048$160,566

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag