Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 27,492

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $727,225,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21Christensen Cattle Co IncFullerton, NE 68638$554,671
22Kuenning Family FarmsImperial, NE 69033$522,134
23Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$521,053
24Opportunity FarmsOneill, NE 68763$507,347
25Ebberson Farms PartnershipColeridge, NE 68727$505,228
26Sundog PartnershipHoldrege, NE 68949$503,070
27Spurgin IncPaxton, NE 69155$500,000
28Krutsinger Ranches LLCNorfolk, NE 68701$500,000
29Nebcat LLCMissoula, MT 59808$500,000
30Peterson Farms PartnershipBertrand, NE 68927$495,696
31Jason And Renae HarmelinkYankton, SD 57078$494,132
32C & R FarmsImperial, NE 69033$482,495
33Chohon FarmsOneill, NE 68763$466,131
34Maple Creek Pig CompanyScribner, NE 68057$459,685
35Rams Horn Dairy LLCYuma, CO 80759$457,186
36Dahlgren Cattle CoBertrand, NE 68927$456,644
37T & E Cattle CoGrand Island, NE 68803$454,859
38R Lazy K IncGlenvil, NE 68941$450,000
39Elting 1950Edgar, NE 68935$447,670
40Hughes Family Farms IncVenango, NE 69168$447,487

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag