Counter Cyclical Program in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 35,630

Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $393,661,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Counter Cyclical Program
1995-2023
41Owl Canyon Farms A Nebraska General PartnershipMadrid, NE 69150$173,136
42Frm FarmsGothenburg, NE 69138$169,657
43Robin & Barb Irvine Jt VtRavenna, NE 68869$163,533
44Ohlman Brothers PartnershipWood River, NE 68883$161,621
45D & D FarmsKearney, NE 68847$156,972
46Hanson FarmsElsie, NE 69134$154,140
47Alfs Farms PartnershipShickley, NE 68436$153,218
48Kenneth & Harland Layher PartnersWood River, NE 68883$151,868
49Sears BrothersAinsworth, NE 69210$151,809
50Gray Farms General PartnershipHoldrege, NE 68949$151,594
51School Creek FarmsOxford, NE 68967$151,457
52Kc FarmsSutton, NE 68979$150,936
53Westesen Farms PtshpKearney, NE 68847$150,881
54K & I Land CompanyValentine, NE 69201$150,613
55Schulz-finch GpPaxton, NE 69155$145,521
56Darrel & Jean Springer J VentureOak, NE 68964$143,768
57Kennedy Brothers PartnershipSutherland, NE 69165$142,758
58Lysle Solomon & Sons PtnrKearney, NE 68847$141,792
59R & M FarmsShickley, NE 68436$140,652
60B & C FarmsAxtell, NE 68924$139,582

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag