Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 27,492

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $727,225,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Circle E Farms PartnershipBelden, NE 68717$971,051
2Danielski Harvesting & FarmingValentine, NE 69201$826,061
3Marsh FarmsHartington, NE 68739$819,793
4Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$800,670
5C J Farms Gen PtnrHoldrege, NE 68949$760,670
6Adams Land & Cattle, LLCBroken Bow, NE 68822$750,000
7Myers & Sons Livestock And Land CompanyCairo, NE 68824$750,000
8Thomas Investment Co IncBroken Bow, NE 68822$750,000
9Na Timmerman IncIndianola, NE 69034$750,000
10Triple T FarmsOrd, NE 68862$740,815
11Southwest FeedersHayes Center, NE 69032$718,143
12Herd Cattle LLCBartlett, NE 68622$695,946
13Olson Farms IncHershey, NE 69143$691,037
14Stromberger & Sons PartnershipImperial, NE 69033$662,228
15Twin County Feeders LLCMinatare, NE 69356$659,086
16Murdoch PartnershipOrleans, NE 68966$647,534
17Thompson Seed Potatoes PtnrAlliance, NE 69301$644,195
18Lamb Farm And FeedyardAnselmo, NE 68813$630,925
19Faessler Farms LtdBridgeport, NE 69336$628,978
20Hamlot, IncSumner, NE 68878$599,721

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag