Total Commodity Programs in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 92,410

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 3rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith) totaled $10,194,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
21Glenn Elting & SonsEdgar, NE 68935$3,818,558
22Woitaszewski Brothers JvWood River, NE 68883$3,738,138
23Chohon FarmsOneill, NE 68763$3,737,370
24Wallinger Farm PartnershipStuart, NE 68780$3,653,421
25Hanchera FarmsDanbury, NE 69026$3,617,892
26Cruise FarmsPleasanton, NE 68866$3,600,981
27Owl Canyon Farms A Nebraska General PartnershipMadrid, NE 69150$3,546,463
28Adams Bank And Trust **Ogallala, NE 69153$3,390,526
29Darrel & Jean Springer J VentureOak, NE 68964$3,304,448
30Dahlgren Cattle CoBertrand, NE 68927$3,240,401
31Kc FarmsSutton, NE 68979$3,190,432
32Triple T FarmsOrd, NE 68862$3,148,939
33Kennedy Brothers PartnershipSutherland, NE 69165$3,140,437
34C & R FarmsImperial, NE 69033$3,140,114
35Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$3,137,429
36Sugar Tree FarmsHebron, NE 68370$3,124,092
37Merna Valley AgMerna, NE 68856$3,094,161
38Myers & Sons Livestock And Land CompanyCairo, NE 68824$3,076,592
39Spurgin IncPaxton, NE 69155$3,070,404
40Sweeney Farm Acct PtnspLoomis, NE 68958$2,957,468

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag