Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of New Jersey (Rep. Jefferson Van Drew), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 178
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of New Jersey (Rep. Jefferson Van Drew) totaled $4,969,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Allen Farms Inc | Salem, NJ 08079 | $363,670 |
2 | E & D Farms LLC | Carneys Point, NJ 08069 | $287,260 |
3 | Coombs Sod Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $195,603 |
4 | Dusty Lane Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $181,707 |
5 | Marino Brothers Partnership | Swedesboro, NJ 08085 | $158,061 |
6 | Chestnut Run Farm Inc | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $150,155 |
7 | Catalano Farms Inc | Salem, NJ 08079 | $122,892 |
8 | New Jersey Audubon Society | Bernardsville, NJ 07924 | $122,831 |
9 | Ed Byrnes | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $113,676 |
10 | Richard Stratton | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $99,476 |
11 | Rabbit Hill Farms LLC | Shiloh, NJ 08353 | $98,893 |
12 | Cassaday Farms LLC | Monroeville, NJ 08343 | $90,368 |
13 | , | $82,036 | |
14 | Natural Lands Trust Inc | Media, PA 19063 | $81,675 |
15 | Culver Farms LLC | Salem, NJ 08079 | $81,218 |
16 | Ronald B Hitchner | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $75,728 |
17 | Charles Hurff | Pilesgrove, NJ 08098 | $73,566 |
18 | Coleman Brothers Farms LLC | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $70,522 |
19 | Brenda Hildreth | Bridgeton, NJ 08302 | $69,802 |
20 | Samuel Garrison | Elmer, NJ 08318 | $66,289 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>