Environmental Quality Incentives Program in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 752

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $11,088,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
21Bell Cattle CompanyCorona, NM 88318$77,743
22Ca Bar Land & Cattle LLCRuidoso, NM 88345$77,086
23Roger ManningLake Arthur, NM 88253$70,133
24Jimmie F WheelerLovington, NM 88260$67,799
25Bonita Canyon Ranch LpSanta Fe, NM 87504$66,731
26Dencil GillisHatch, NM 87937$62,640
27Don HartmanDeming, NM 88030$62,466
28Stephen R Janos & Patricia L JanoT Or C, NM 87901$60,976
29Richard J ManningCorona, NM 88318$60,684
30Bogle Ltd CoDexter, NM 88230$59,400
31Perelli Minetti Trust IIINewport Beach, CA 92663$57,811
32Double L FarmsLake Arthur, NM 88253$55,494
33Koontz Ranch IncFort Sumner, NM 88119$53,763
34Betty G RosenbergerFort Sumner, NM 88119$50,655
35Mangus Ranch LLCQuemado, NM 87829$50,044
36Daniel Adams Dba Adams Corona RanGalesville, WI 54630$50,000
37Ranney Ranch Partnership LpCorona, NM 88318$50,000
38Terry B AdamsCorona, NM 88318$50,000
39Double R Land & Cattle Co IncBlanket, TX 76432$50,000
40Maxwell Ranch IncCarrizozo, NM 88301$49,998

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag