Non-insured Disaster Assistance in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 316
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $2,568,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Noisy Water Winery, Inc. | Ruidoso, NM 88345 | $142,918 |
2 | Hurt Cattle Co Inc | Deming, NM 88031 | $101,862 |
3 | Badger Creek Corporation | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $96,031 |
4 | Harriet Ranch LLC | Datil, NM 87821 | $78,684 |
5 | Tim Muncy | San Antonio, NM 87832 | $69,702 |
6 | Robert Craig Woody | Chaparral, NM 88081 | $62,936 |
7 | Alamo Ranch Company | Deming, NM 88031 | $41,903 |
8 | Ghost Lake Corporation | Springerville, AZ 85938 | $39,381 |
9 | Ace Peterson | San Simon, AZ 85632 | $38,315 |
10 | Joe Bill Nunn | Deming, NM 88030 | $35,275 |
11 | 2c Ranch General Partnership | Tyrone, NM 88065 | $34,654 |
12 | L T Cattle Co LLC | Silver City, NM 88062 | $28,844 |
13 | Nye Cattle Company Inc | Quemado, NM 87829 | $27,158 |
14 | Hubbell Livestock Company | Quemado, NM 87829 | $26,079 |
15 | Joel T Nelson | Glenwood, NM 88039 | $24,387 |
16 | Harrington Ranch Partners | Mimbres, NM 88049 | $23,949 |
17 | Johnson Ranches LLC | Columbus, NM 88029 | $23,834 |
18 | , | $21,775 | |
19 | Maxwell Ranch Inc | Claunch, NM 87011 | $21,627 |
20 | Russ Slaughter | Mule Creek, NM 88051 | $20,860 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>