Counter Cyclical Program in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,701
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 2nd District of New Mexico (Rep. Xochitl Torres Small) totaled $45,831,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | M & G Joint Venture | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $1,026,519 |
2 | Ross Hilburn Farms | Denver City, TX 79323 | $975,244 |
3 | Gary & Karen Jackson Farms | Hobbs, NM 88241 | $639,470 |
4 | Horner Farms Inc | Artesia, NM 88211 | $614,056 |
5 | Lawrence Enterprises Limited Partnership Llp | Hobbs, NM 88242 | $568,463 |
6 | Judah Farms Jv | Lubbock, TX 79424 | $524,158 |
7 | Rancho La Frontera | Columbus, NM 88029 | $454,927 |
8 | Joe Tarbet | Lubbock, TX 79423 | $448,209 |
9 | Brian & Karen Snodgrass Farms | Seminole, TX 79360 | $435,810 |
10 | Larry Parker | Hobbs, NM 88242 | $432,477 |
11 | Bogle Ltd Co | Dexter, NM 88230 | $417,892 |
12 | Rogers Inc | Artesia, NM 88210 | $389,754 |
13 | Brantley Farms | Carlsbad, NM 88220 | $344,877 |
14 | Holguin Farms Inc | Las Cruces, NM 88004 | $326,038 |
15 | Willard Deerman Jr | La Mesa, NM 88044 | $315,430 |
16 | Alfadale Inc | Artesia, NM 88210 | $309,702 |
17 | F & S Farms | Seminole, TX 79360 | $307,898 |
18 | Francis D Shiflett | Deming, NM 88030 | $307,041 |
19 | Wier Brothers Inc | Lovington, NM 88260 | $296,846 |
20 | F & R Custom Farms Inc | Seminole, TX 79360 | $294,988 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>