Counter Cyclical Program in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 529
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in 3rd District of New Mexico (Rep. Ben Lujan) totaled $5,145,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Rush Farms Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $19,645 |
42 | Randal J Podzemny | Amarillo, TX 79124 | $19,118 |
43 | Rush Ranch Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $18,412 |
44 | Larry F Perkins | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $18,378 |
45 | E & L Aschbacher LLC | Sedan, NM 88436 | $18,108 |
46 | Ron Mckay Farms LLC | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $17,568 |
47 | Rush Land & Cattle Co Inc | Mcalister, NM 88427 | $17,278 |
48 | Arrow Cattle | Texline, TX 79087 | $17,260 |
49 | Dennis Day | Texline, TX 79087 | $16,028 |
50 | Sharon L Cardwell | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $15,966 |
51 | Michael S Fitzgerald | Mosquero, NM 87733 | $15,863 |
52 | Estrada Farms Inc | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $15,759 |
53 | Rising Star Agricultural Producti | Sedan, NM 88436 | $15,519 |
54 | Manuel A Lopez | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $14,885 |
55 | Johnny Irving | Logan, NM 88426 | $14,624 |
56 | Alvie R Peacock | House, NM 88121 | $14,080 |
57 | Elmer Schuster | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $14,037 |
58 | Mckenzie Land & Livestock Company | Encino, NM 88321 | $13,995 |
59 | Shannon Runyan | Mc Alister, NM 88427 | $13,841 |
60 | T-4 Cattle Co LLC | Tucumcari, NM 88401 | $13,766 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”