Conservation Reserve Program in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 169
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik) totaled $2,774,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Renee C Smith | De Kalb Junction, NY 13630 | $22,056 |
42 | Shawn D Spellacy | Canton, NY 13617 | $21,915 |
43 | D Gordon Warren | Brier Hill, NY 13614 | $21,448 |
44 | Douglas Malette | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $21,265 |
45 | Arthur G Meacham | Brasher Falls, NY 13613 | $21,174 |
46 | Gary C Williams | Mahomet, IL 61853 | $21,128 |
47 | Glory P Martel | Ogdensburg, NY 13669 | $21,026 |
48 | Wayne A Latham | Ogdensburg, NY 13669 | $20,019 |
49 | Katrina Hebb | Hermon, NY 13652 | $19,551 |
50 | Tamara A Travis | Madrid, NY 13660 | $19,508 |
51 | Earle Travis Jr | Madrid, NY 13660 | $19,049 |
52 | Charles White | Hogansburg, NY 13655 | $18,572 |
53 | Southworth Irrevocable Trust | Burke, NY 12917 | $18,254 |
54 | Full & By Farm | Essex, NY 12936 | $17,856 |
55 | Paradise Valley Farm | Madrid, NY 13660 | $17,170 |
56 | Brandon Brant | Westport, NY 12993 | $16,836 |
57 | Bernard F Reed Sr | Hermon, NY 13652 | $16,784 |
58 | Darwin & Stephen Wallace | Heuvelton, NY 13654 | $16,481 |
59 | John H Wolfe Jr | Norfolk, NY 13667 | $16,237 |
60 | Jeffrey A Thayer | Canton, NY 13617 | $16,136 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”