Farm Subsidy information
21st District of New York
(Rep. Elise Stefanik)
Total Subsidies in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 216
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik) totaled $7,752,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chambers Farms LLC | Heuvelton, NY 13654 | $209,798 |
| 2 | Adon Farms Operations LLC | Potsdam, NY 13676 | $187,579 |
| 3 | Bilow Farms LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $175,846 |
| 4 | Mapleview Cattle Company, LLC | Madrid, NY 13660 | $166,662 |
| 5 | Gebarten Acres Operations LLC | Hermon, NY 13652 | $161,277 |
| 6 | Woodcrest Dairy LLC | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $158,475 |
| 7 | Papas Dairy LLC | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $157,859 |
| 8 | Stargo Dairy Farm LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $145,417 |
| 9 | River Breeze Dairy LLC | Chase Mills, NY 13621 | $142,719 |
| 10 | Royal-j-acres LLC | Ogdensburg, NY 13669 | $140,670 |
| 11 | Carsada Dairy LLC | Malone, NY 12953 | $139,177 |
| 12 | Trainer Farm LLC | Chateaugay, NY 12920 | $138,870 |
| 13 | Monica Farms LLC | North Bangor, NY 12966 | $131,797 |
| 14 | Brockway Hilltop Farms LLC | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $131,248 |
| 15 | Sunset Lake Farm No 2 LLC | South Burlington, VT 05403 | $129,472 |
| 16 | Dans Dairy LLC | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $129,010 |
| 17 | Mr Randall Ooms | Constable, NY 12926 | $128,786 |
| 18 | Twin Mill Farms LLC | Ogdensburg, NY 13669 | $128,130 |
| 19 | Flack Farms, LLC | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $126,803 |
| 20 | L. T. Smith & Sons Farms LLC | Canton, NY 13617 | $126,182 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
