Conservation Reserve Program in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 169
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 21st District of New York (Rep. Elise Stefanik) totaled $2,774,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ghames Farms LLC | Canton, NY 13617 | $36,304 |
22 | Rickie Moore | Canton, NY 13617 | $35,512 |
23 | Cedar Meadows Farm LLC | Lisbon, NY 13658 | $35,398 |
24 | Leerkes Farm Inc | Ticonderoga, NY 12883 | $34,873 |
25 | Michael A Geremia | Burke, NY 12917 | $33,461 |
26 | Fred Perrin | Ogdensburg, NY 13669 | $33,149 |
27 | Allen G Langtry | Brier Hill, NY 13614 | $32,934 |
28 | Bruce Maitland | Robesonia, PA 19551 | $31,447 |
29 | Donald J Whiteford | Hermon, NY 13652 | $31,363 |
30 | Brockway Hilltop Farms LLC | Fort Covington, NY 12937 | $30,756 |
31 | Norco Farms | Hopkinton, NY 12965 | $30,532 |
32 | Amy J Moulton | Madrid, NY 13660 | $29,651 |
33 | Ghames Farms LLC | Canton, NY 13617 | $29,397 |
34 | Teriele Brothers | Canton, NY 13617 | $29,276 |
35 | James F Durant | Bombay, NY 12914 | $26,081 |
36 | Dillon Thomas Klepetar | Essex, NY 12936 | $25,995 |
37 | Jerrold Sherman | Westport, NY 12993 | $25,591 |
38 | Katherine Whiteford | Hermon, NY 13652 | $24,010 |
39 | Brock Bartenslager | Malone, NY 12953 | $23,658 |
40 | Kyle Johnson | Canton, NY 13617 | $23,510 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”