Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Ohio (Rep. Brad Wenstrup), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 283
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Ohio (Rep. Brad Wenstrup) totaled $8,783,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael Schlanger | Saint Petersburg, FL 33707 | $109,972 |
22 | Shirley Pratter | Jeffersonville, OH 43128 | $109,293 |
23 | Phillip Brown | South Shore, KY 41175 | $100,087 |
24 | Ronald Storer | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $98,938 |
25 | Hall Wildlife Farms LLC | Waynesville, OH 45068 | $96,864 |
26 | Norma C Logan | Morehead, KY 40351 | $95,963 |
27 | Deer Haven Ltd | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $95,467 |
28 | Blue Creek Farm Limited Liability | West Union, OH 45693 | $86,043 |
29 | Greg Verderber | Winchester, OH 45697 | $84,603 |
30 | Rickey Hilterbran | Peebles, OH 45660 | $78,684 |
31 | Earl Grimes | Winchester, OH 45697 | $76,638 |
32 | Loretta Porter | Winchester, OH 45697 | $75,410 |
33 | John C Lowder Sr | Peebles, OH 45660 | $74,290 |
34 | Matthew E Trefz | Winchester, OH 45697 | $71,294 |
35 | Eagle Creek Cattle Co LLC | Moscow, OH 45153 | $70,437 |
36 | Grover Henry | Peebles, OH 45660 | $69,427 |
37 | Ella Schlanger | South Pasadena, FL 33707 | $69,290 |
38 | Dottie Latham | Winchester, OH 45697 | $68,192 |
39 | Willard Nixon | Enon, OH 45323 | $63,360 |
40 | Warren P Lewis | Peebles, OH 45660 | $62,817 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”