Total Commodity Programs in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,601,322

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in the United States totaled $278,792,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2023
1Riceland Foods IncStuttgart, AR 72160$554,343,039
2Producers Rice Mill IncStuttgart, AR 72160$314,028,012
3Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$302,596,855
4Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$229,789,261
5Farmers Rice CoopSacramento, CA 95851$146,174,314
6Agcountry Farm Credit Services **Jamestown, ND 58402$81,784,922
7First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$74,954,157
8Capital Farm Credit **El Campo, TX 77437$68,533,048
9Agheritage **Brinkley, AR 72021$65,006,588
10Agtexas Fcs **Brownfield, TX 79316$53,445,812
11Chs IncKindred, ND 58051$48,373,730
12Prosperity Bank **El Campo, TX 77437$48,168,035
13Farm Credit Midsouth Pca **Barton, AR 72312$38,343,904
14City Bank **Lubbock, TX 79408$37,619,807
15Tyler FarmsHelena, AR 72342$34,611,595
16First State Bank Of Blakely **Colquitt, GA 39837$33,098,631
17Simmons 1st National Bank **Lake Village, AR 71653$31,892,122
18Aggeorgia Farm Credit Aca **Ocilla, GA 31774$30,437,770
19Kelley EnterprisesBurlison, TN 38015$30,294,784
20First United Bank **Seagraves, TX 79359$29,903,998

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag