Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Oklahoma
(Rep. Markwayne Mullin)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 25,583
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Oklahoma (Rep. Markwayne Mullin) totaled $777,949,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Alan Ritchey Inc | Hendrix, OK 74741 | $881,804 |
62 | Triple T Farms Dba Tate Cattle Company | Lakin, KS 67860 | $880,930 |
63 | James R Fuser | Afton, OK 74331 | $875,610 |
64 | Sethiena English | De Kalb, TX 75559 | $870,966 |
65 | Michael W Voss | Checotah, OK 74426 | $866,031 |
66 | Bob Kropp | Miami, OK 74354 | $852,014 |
67 | Dale E Boyd | Fairland, OK 74343 | $844,464 |
68 | Jerry C Standifer | Hendrix, OK 74741 | $833,757 |
69 | Gerald Knapp | Talihina, OK 74571 | $824,871 |
70 | Victor Ranch | Afton, OK 74331 | $820,465 |
71 | Tony Small | Welch, OK 74369 | $819,088 |
72 | Mark W Yazel & Brenda G Yazel Revocable Trust | Vinita, OK 74301 | $817,329 |
73 | Billy Flanagan | Grant, OK 74738 | $816,386 |
74 | Jim Leon Gist | Spiro, OK 74959 | $807,961 |
75 | Jack Bradshaw | Grant, OK 74738 | $804,348 |
76 | James H Robinson Jr | Boswell, OK 74727 | $802,655 |
77 | Clinton W Langley | Hugo, OK 74743 | $797,709 |
78 | Pates Farm Inc | Muldrow, OK 74948 | $793,990 |
79 | David Griswold | Miami, OK 74354 | $788,574 |
80 | Robert B Vazquez | Welch, OK 74369 | $787,023 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”