Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,748
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden) totaled $735,511,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Terry & Marilyn Eakin | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $1,903,480 |
| 22 | Martin Underhill Farms Partnershi | Dufur, OR 97021 | $1,887,402 |
| 23 | Lyle And Virginia Peck Ranches | Heppner, OR 97836 | $1,874,833 |
| 24 | Pine Canyon Ranch Gp | Paso Robles, CA 93447 | $1,871,897 |
| 25 | T & K Ranching | Heppner, OR 97836 | $1,835,855 |
| 26 | Johnson-lane Farming | Arlington, OR 97812 | $1,804,942 |
| 27 | Terjeson Ranches | Helix, OR 97835 | $1,766,239 |
| 28 | Munkers Farms | Lexington, OR 97839 | $1,759,540 |
| 29 | Earl Ranch | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $1,759,446 |
| 30 | Burns Paiute Tribe | Burns, OR 97720 | $1,676,054 |
| 31 | Cold Springs Ranches | Helix, OR 97835 | $1,660,297 |
| 32 | Snyder Ranches | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,635,935 |
| 33 | Decker Ranch | Kent, OR 97033 | $1,615,170 |
| 34 | Confederated Tribes Of Warm Springs | Warm Springs, OR 97761 | $1,541,259 |
| 35 | Wegner Creek Ranch | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $1,455,380 |
| 36 | Douglas E Wilson | Condon, OR 97823 | $1,361,779 |
| 37 | Coho Inc | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $1,359,973 |
| 38 | Kathy C Nelson | Pilot Rock, OR 97868 | $1,351,060 |
| 39 | Clear Creek Cattle Company | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $1,343,880 |
| 40 | Doug & Carley Drake Ranch | Heppner, OR 97836 | $1,338,556 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf