Conservation Reserve Program in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,748
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 2nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden) totaled $735,511,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hoke Ranches | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $7,243,492 |
2 | Nolin Farming Company | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $6,989,917 |
3 | H M Ranch | Heppner, OR 97836 | $5,262,653 |
4 | Bureau Of Indian Affairs | Winnebago, NE 68071 | $2,875,466 |
5 | Schomp Ranch | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $2,866,225 |
6 | Fields Ranches | Wasco, OR 97065 | $2,757,751 |
7 | Ctuir | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $2,646,293 |
8 | Rafter Zee Ranches | Ione, OR 97843 | $2,612,437 |
9 | Smith Family Farms | Condon, OR 97823 | $2,592,303 |
10 | Western Grain | Heppner, OR 97836 | $2,571,493 |
11 | Wendell & Joyce Clodfelter | Grass Valley, OR 97029 | $2,260,842 |
12 | Thompson Land | Heppner, OR 97836 | $2,240,503 |
13 | A & K Ranches | San Francisco, CA 94118 | $2,198,230 |
14 | Eastern Oregon Investment Management | La Grande, OR 97850 | $2,156,280 |
15 | Jeff Cutsforth's Farm | Lexington, OR 97839 | $2,010,110 |
16 | Wolfe Hereford Ranch | Wallowa, OR 97885 | $1,997,663 |
17 | Rupp Ranches | Richland, WA 99352 | $1,967,923 |
18 | Richard A Peterson Ranch | Ione, OR 97843 | $1,923,666 |
19 | Stangel Industries & Machine Shop Partnership | Enterprise, OR 97828 | $1,913,269 |
20 | James H & Darlene L Nordquist | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $1,905,060 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>