Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 66

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline) totaled $1,359,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1The Rhode Island Nurseries IncMiddletown, RI 02842$185,935
2Hoogendoorn Nurseries IncMiddletown, RI 02842$182,802
3Decastro Farms IncPortsmouth, RI 02871$101,078
4Portsmouth Nursery Inc.Portsmouth, RI 02871$99,305
5Young Family FarmLittle Compton, RI 02837$71,100
6Ferolbink Farms IncTiverton, RI 02878$67,172
7Salt Water Farms LLCNorth Kingstown, RI 02852$65,179
8Mello's Farm & Flower CenterPortsmouth, RI 02871$62,898
9Wishing Stone IncLittle Compton, RI 02837$52,265
10Cotta Farm, LLCPortsmouth, RI 02871$35,015
11Pond View Gardens LLCLittle Compton, RI 02837$32,787
12Sweet Berry FarmMiddletown, RI 02842$31,830
13David S FrerichsWarren, RI 02885$24,232
14Skinny Dip FarmLittle Compton, RI 02837$23,685
15Newport Vineyards & Winery LLCMiddletown, RI 02842$23,021
16Roots FarmTiverton, RI 02878$22,629
17Escobar Farm LLCPortsmouth, RI 02871$22,084
18Little State Flower CompanyTiverton, RI 02878$21,919
19Franlart Nurseries IncLittle Compton, RI 02837$16,532
20Michael D FlynnMiddletown, RI 02842$15,629

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag