Market Loss Assistance Program in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in 1st District of Rhode Island (Rep. David Cicilline) totaled $81,020 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Louis Escobar | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $16,171 |
2 | Fairholm Farms Ltd | Cincinnatus, NY 13040 | $15,512 |
3 | John F Bettencourt | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $14,343 |
4 | Joseph F Dutra | Jamestown, RI 02835 | $12,845 |
5 | Raymond Turcotte | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $6,268 |
6 | Lucien Lebreux | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $5,325 |
7 | George Peters | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $3,322 |
8 | William Hathaway | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $1,726 |
9 | Manuel J Silvia | Middletown, RI 02842 | $1,640 |
10 | Manuel Peters | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $756 |
11 | Robert Chace | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $601 |
12 | Paul B Pieri | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $592 |
13 | Robert B Babcock | Tiverton, RI 02878 | $474 |
14 | Whimshaw Farm | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $312 |
15 | David M Cotta | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $213 |
16 | Byron S Kee | Warren, RI 02885 | $209 |
17 | David Cotta | Portsmouth, RI 02871 | $141 |
18 | Emerson Wildes | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $132 |
19 | Josie Richmond | Little Compton, RI 02837 | $105 |
20 | David S Frerichs | Warren, RI 02885 | $93 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>