Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 3rd District of South Carolina (Rep. Jeff Duncan), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 404

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 3rd District of South Carolina (Rep. Jeff Duncan) totaled $1,234,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Paige McphailSeneca, SC 29678$44,056
2Felice LardiereSeneca, SC 29672$29,045
3Charles WhitenWestminster, SC 29693$29,039
4Stone Farms IncWestminster, SC 29693$21,605
5Westley D McallisterMount Carmel, SC 29840$20,625
6Neil B McphailSeneca, SC 29678$17,933
7Charles R Hannah JrAbbeville, SC 29620$16,804
8Chattooga Belle Farm LLCLong Creek, SC 29658$16,474
9E & R FarmsGreenwood, SC 29646$16,390
10Oakway Farms LLCWestminster, SC 29693$15,644
11James W WrightLowndesville, SC 29659$15,455
12John R HarrisFair Play, SC 29643$15,198
13Prescott Darren BoslerAbbeville, SC 29620$13,750
14Natural Farms Of The Carolinas LlWest Union, SC 29696$13,437
15Nickles Poultry & Cattle Farms Inc.Seneca, SC 29678$13,035
16J Denver PowellWestminster, SC 29693$12,687
17Hugh Franklin Ables JrWestminster, SC 29693$12,445
18Kenneth E CainWestminster, SC 29693$12,210
19Ronald Wade MartinWestminster, SC 29693$11,880
20James R Robins SrMountain Rest, SC 29664$11,808

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag