Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 490

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $12,396,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Bruce G Price & SonsLittle Rock, SC 29567$430,849
2Squires Brothers FarmsAynor, SC 29511$269,714
3Calhoun FarmsClio, SC 29525$256,994
4Bentwood Farms LLCMonroe, NC 28110$250,000
5Larry Stephen RabonGalivants Ferry, SC 29544$221,243
6Glasdrum FarmsLittle Rock, SC 29567$205,835
7Rhett Covington FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$170,385
8Frank & Cheryle RogersBlenheim, SC 29516$156,695
9Pat And Blake Rogers FarmsBlenheim, SC 29516$151,878
10Gregory Harold HugginsNichols, SC 29581$149,076
11Alan Gray BurroughsBlenheim, SC 29516$142,614
12Daniel B WinburnAynor, SC 29511$140,797
13Jack And Walter H Price Dba Price & Price FarmsDillon, SC 29536$135,024
14Kayson T StricklandNichols, SC 29581$129,434
15Richard & Jane Rogers FarmBennettsville, SC 29512$127,300
16William H Durant IIAynor, SC 29511$126,475
17Hammond Farm 2Nichols, SC 29581$120,534
18Jmh Farms LLCBennettsville, SC 29512$120,227
19Matthew H BrownConway, SC 29526$114,699
20J Allan Mcdonald FarmsTatum, SC 29594$111,891

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag