Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,077

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $15,041,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
1Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$790,036
2Bruce G Price & SonsLittle Rock, SC 29567$392,949
3Jack And Walter H Price Dba Price & Price FarmsDillon, SC 29536$313,361
4Betty Allen FarmsLatta, SC 29565$247,382
5Calhoun FarmsClio, SC 29525$199,142
6Bentwood Farms LLCMonroe, NC 28110$198,401
7Glasdrum FarmsLittle Rock, SC 29567$163,175
8Drew FarmsMullins, SC 29574$155,713
9Frank & Cheryle RogersBlenheim, SC 29516$154,076
10David Cox Farms IncLake View, SC 29563$153,301
11Kenneth Long & SonsLatta, SC 29565$146,492
12Floyd Johnson JrLatta, SC 29565$141,184
13Little Pee Dee FarmsDillon, SC 29536$137,387
14Douglas H & Margaret H NewtonClio, SC 29525$130,793
15J Allan Mcdonald FarmsTatum, SC 29594$127,661
16Cooley Cattle Company IncRockingham, NC 28380$124,998
17Jeffrey B BlantonMullins, SC 29574$124,083
18Steven Neal Baxley JrMarion, SC 29571$117,539
19Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$117,460
20Steven BaxleyMarion, SC 29571$114,278

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag