Conservation Reserve Program in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 261
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $289,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Doyle Family LLC | Aynor, SC 29511 | $20,302 |
2 | Blackwater LLC | Aynor, SC 29511 | $13,645 |
3 | Holliday Associates LLC | Galivants Ferry, SC 29544 | $11,448 |
4 | Mary K Jo Shelley Gasque | Nichols, SC 29581 | $5,872 |
5 | Dale W Shelley | Green Sea, SC 29545 | $5,136 |
6 | Tammy L Blount-wright | Loris, SC 29569 | $5,089 |
7 | Malcolm Campbell | Loris, SC 29569 | $4,898 |
8 | Associates Iv LLC | Myrtle Beach, SC 29577 | $4,895 |
9 | Tatum Farm And Timber LLC | Alexandria, VA 22308 | $4,566 |
10 | J Lavon Dorman | Conway, SC 29527 | $4,468 |
11 | Nancy L Buffkin | Green Sea, SC 29545 | $4,333 |
12 | Charles L Cooke Sr | Loris, SC 29569 | $4,103 |
13 | Faye Page Hufford | Loris, SC 29569 | $3,706 |
14 | Gregory Harold Huggins | Nichols, SC 29581 | $3,591 |
15 | Charles A Oneal | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $3,188 |
16 | John Marsden Miller | Loris, SC 29569 | $3,182 |
17 | South Butler Road Holdings LLC | Dillon, SC 29536 | $2,836 |
18 | Allene H Hardee | Loris, SC 29569 | $2,819 |
19 | Lewis Homestead LLC | Charlotte, NC 28211 | $2,544 |
20 | Sadie W Shoe | Nichols, SC 29581 | $2,475 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>