Market Gains in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 162
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $3,745,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Marlboro Tobacco Farms LLC | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $183,560 |
2 | Glasdrum Farms | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $178,305 |
3 | Strickland Farms Of Green Sea Inc | Green Sea, SC 29545 | $146,952 |
4 | J Allan Mcdonald Farms | Tatum, SC 29594 | $146,538 |
5 | Calhoun Farms | Clio, SC 29525 | $141,506 |
6 | Bruce G Price & Sons | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $138,237 |
7 | Betty Allen Farms | Latta, SC 29565 | $126,236 |
8 | Rhett Covington Farms | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $114,121 |
9 | Frank & Cheryle Rogers | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $106,396 |
10 | Spring Hills Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $104,786 |
11 | William C Covington Jr | Clio, SC 29525 | $94,449 |
12 | Baxley & Baxley Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $90,663 |
13 | Pat And Blake Rogers Farms | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $79,163 |
14 | John Mcinnis Farms Inc | Clio, SC 29525 | $72,213 |
15 | Oneal Bros | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $66,969 |
16 | Charles Smith Miller | Nichols, SC 29581 | $65,608 |
17 | Burns Farms Inc | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $63,869 |
18 | W G Tatum Farm | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $63,108 |
19 | Michael G Gibson | Marion, SC 29571 | $56,318 |
20 | Steven Baxley | Marion, SC 29571 | $54,310 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>