Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 928

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $27,825,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2023
1Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$2,465,339
2Calhoun FarmsClio, SC 29525$1,303,309
3Glasdrum FarmsLittle Rock, SC 29567$994,789
4Frank & Cheryle RogersBlenheim, SC 29516$850,145
5Betty Allen FarmsLatta, SC 29565$805,301
6Bruce G Price & SonsLittle Rock, SC 29567$756,885
7Rhett Covington FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$740,488
8William C Covington JrClio, SC 29525$670,014
9Pat And Blake Rogers FarmsBlenheim, SC 29516$533,633
10J Allan Mcdonald FarmsTatum, SC 29594$489,144
11Bryant Farms IncDillon, SC 29536$467,804
12Drew FarmsMullins, SC 29574$437,881
13First Citizens Bank **Mc Coll, SC 29570$428,536
14Richard & Jane Rogers FarmBennettsville, SC 29512$363,809
15The Promise Land Stillwell FarmsMc Coll, SC 29570$350,941
16Michael G GibsonMarion, SC 29571$336,790
17Douglas H & Margaret H NewtonClio, SC 29525$327,463
18Michael And Tony Poston PartnersMullins, SC 29574$310,198
19Baxley & Baxley FarmsDillon, SC 29536$301,068
20Legette FarmsMarion, SC 29571$288,581

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag