Total Commodity Programs in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 698
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 7th District of South Carolina (Rep. Tim Rice) totaled $10,359,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | T G Gibson Farms | Gibson, NC 28343 | $55,074 |
42 | Steve Suggs | Green Sea, SC 29545 | $55,057 |
43 | Daniel B Winburn | Aynor, SC 29511 | $54,884 |
44 | E Duncan Ayers | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $54,865 |
45 | Shawn M Causey | Nichols, SC 29581 | $54,655 |
46 | Steven H Edge | Conway, SC 29526 | $53,169 |
47 | Floyd Johnson Jr | Latta, SC 29565 | $51,587 |
48 | Hammond Farm 2 | Nichols, SC 29581 | $51,109 |
49 | Kylie D Strickland | Nichols, SC 29581 | $51,009 |
50 | William H Durant II | Aynor, SC 29511 | $50,855 |
51 | Gregory Harold Huggins | Nichols, SC 29581 | $49,039 |
52 | Douglas H & Margaret H Newton | Clio, SC 29525 | $47,865 |
53 | Pressley Johnson | Galivants Ferry, SC 29544 | $46,981 |
54 | Daniel Joyner Nance | Lake View, SC 29563 | $46,685 |
55 | Marlboro Tobacco Farms LLC | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $45,725 |
56 | Russell J Tyler | Loris, SC 29569 | $42,715 |
57 | Spring Hills Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $42,588 |
58 | Baxley & Baxley Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $42,256 |
59 | Neal Moore | Mullins, SC 29574 | $41,615 |
60 | William Forrest Graham | Loris, SC 29569 | $40,952 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”