Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Tennessee
(Rep. Phil Roe)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Tennessee (Rep. Phil Roe), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,817
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Tennessee (Rep. Phil Roe) totaled $3,875,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $14,862 |
42 | Ryan D Ricker | Greeneville, TN 37743 | $14,270 |
43 | C & T Cattle | Johnson City, TN 37604 | $13,979 |
44 | Kaylon Shepherd | Greeneville, TN 37743 | $13,828 |
45 | Michael David Cox | Kingsport, TN 37663 | $13,413 |
46 | Robert T Ottinger Jr | Parrottsville, TN 37843 | $13,235 |
47 | James Turbyfill | Roan Mountain, TN 37687 | $12,707 |
48 | Michael C Gray | Afton, TN 37616 | $12,355 |
49 | Afton Farms LLC | Limestone, TN 37681 | $12,342 |
50 | Tommy John English | Mohawk, TN 37810 | $12,255 |
51 | William L Runion | Erwin, TN 37650 | $11,960 |
52 | Joel Shell | Jonesborough, TN 37659 | $11,929 |
53 | Michael J Hagie | Limestone, TN 37681 | $11,908 |
54 | Dane M Holland | Mosheim, TN 37818 | $11,899 |
55 | Scott Thompson | Limestone, TN 37681 | $11,515 |
56 | Jeff Aiken | Telford, TN 37690 | $11,362 |
57 | Walt Moulton III | Jonesborough, TN 37659 | $11,345 |
58 | James C Knight | Mosheim, TN 37818 | $11,247 |
59 | Woods Brothers Farm | Elizabethton, TN 37643 | $10,171 |
60 | Chad Harris | Jonesborough, TN 37659 | $10,127 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”