Total Conservation Programs in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 128
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $1,177,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Shirley Sue Shortes | Seminole, TX 79360 | $5,739 |
42 | Charles W Blumentritt | Dallas, TX 75252 | $5,591 |
43 | T & J Farms | Seminole, TX 79360 | $5,460 |
44 | Roitsch Krauss Krause And Stancik | Houston, TX 77024 | $5,383 |
45 | Mark H Gully | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $5,089 |
46 | Judy Neufeld | Seminole, TX 79360 | $5,083 |
47 | Tim Neufeld | Seminole, TX 79360 | $5,083 |
48 | Tyler M Allen | Austin, TX 78731 | $5,046 |
49 | Carolyn B Allen | Austin, TX 78731 | $5,046 |
50 | Terrell C Sheen | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $4,995 |
51 | Charles B Blanek | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $4,686 |
52 | Wood Partnership | Ballinger, TX 76821 | $4,477 |
53 | Mary Ann Thompson | San Angelo, TX 76901 | $4,233 |
54 | Ceth D Holubec | Melvin, TX 76858 | $4,193 |
55 | Trail Ranch Headquarters | Paint Rock, TX 76866 | $4,181 |
56 | Jorge F Guenther | Seminole, TX 79360 | $4,160 |
57 | Susan Guenther | Seminole, TX 79360 | $4,160 |
58 | Judith K Shiller | Miles, TX 76861 | $3,826 |
59 | Sandra Renae Rodgers | Eden, TX 76837 | $3,801 |
60 | Calf Creek Ranch Ltd | Lampasas, TX 76550 | $3,717 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”