Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 207
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in 11th District of Texas (Rep. Michael Conaway) totaled $6,612,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Kevin Sturm | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $47,022 |
42 | Charles Book | Miles, TX 76861 | $46,475 |
43 | Johnny T Beach | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $44,762 |
44 | Will Weatherford | Veribest, TX 76886 | $43,523 |
45 | Calvin Eugene Schwertner | Brady, TX 76825 | $42,253 |
46 | Barry Anderson | Brady, TX 76825 | $41,258 |
47 | Chester Jacoby | Melvin, TX 76858 | $40,620 |
48 | Michael Braden | San Angelo, TX 76905 | $39,513 |
49 | Larry W Walker | Lohn, TX 76852 | $38,890 |
50 | J A Ranne III | Brady, TX 76825 | $36,412 |
51 | W Malcolm Davis | Galveston, TX 77554 | $36,396 |
52 | Hoelscher Farms | San Angelo, TX 76902 | $36,330 |
53 | Brian Dierschke | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $33,497 |
54 | Brent M Heinze | Miles, TX 76861 | $32,253 |
55 | Craig Pfluger Farms | Eden, TX 76837 | $32,095 |
56 | Edg Farms LLC | Mereta, TX 76940 | $31,380 |
57 | Gail Stefanski | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $30,592 |
58 | Concho Valley Farms Inc | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $30,119 |
59 | Vivian Book | Miles, TX 76861 | $29,315 |
60 | Adam D Holik | San Angelo, TX 76904 | $29,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”