Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 34th District of Texas (Rep. Filemon Vela), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 290
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 34th District of Texas (Rep. Filemon Vela) totaled $2,819,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Anaqua Farms | Lyford, TX 78569 | $210,834 |
2 | Swanberg Farms | Lyford, TX 78569 | $185,486 |
3 | Chappell Farms | Raymondville, TX 78580 | $180,404 |
4 | El Jardin Partnership | Raymondville, TX 78580 | $132,600 |
5 | J & H Scogin Farms | Lyford, TX 78569 | $132,404 |
6 | Double Z Farms | Lyford, TX 78569 | $120,418 |
7 | 7l Farm | Lyford, TX 78569 | $111,196 |
8 | Zdansky Joint Venture | Lyford, TX 78569 | $103,742 |
9 | Galle Farms Ptn | Lyford, TX 78569 | $98,024 |
10 | First Community Bank ** | Lyford, TX 78569 | $97,510 |
11 | C & W Scogin Farms | Lyford, TX 78569 | $96,081 |
12 | Las Dos Palmas Farms Partnership | Raymondville, TX 78580 | $88,842 |
13 | Pohlmeyer | Lyford, TX 78569 | $79,882 |
14 | A Spence Pennington Farms | Raymondville, TX 78580 | $79,486 |
15 | Magnolia Farms | Raymondville, TX 78580 | $74,834 |
16 | Widget Farms | Lyford, TX 78569 | $74,528 |
17 | C & V Farms | San Perlita, TX 78590 | $69,300 |
18 | Chuck Mcdonald Farms | Monte Alto, TX 78538 | $61,388 |
19 | Encino Farms | Raymondville, TX 78580 | $60,024 |
20 | Dewitt Farms | Raymondville, TX 78580 | $57,920 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>