Conservation Reserve Program in 1st District of Utah (Rep. Rob Bishop), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 132
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 1st District of Utah (Rep. Rob Bishop) totaled $823,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Innovasis Properties LLC | Springville, UT 84663 | $12,010 |
22 | Brent Blundell | Clarkston, UT 84305 | $11,020 |
23 | Dennie Barson | Smithfield, UT 84335 | $10,790 |
24 | Roger Earley | Laketown, UT 84038 | $10,484 |
25 | Alley Madsen Farms LLC | Fruit Heights, UT 84037 | $10,396 |
26 | Glen Benson | Newton, UT 84327 | $9,909 |
27 | Bravo Land Company LLC | Clarkston, UT 84305 | $9,550 |
28 | Newel R Thompson Family LLC | Salt Lake City, UT 84116 | $7,977 |
29 | Udell Godfrey | Clarkston, UT 84305 | $7,873 |
30 | Pearson Family Partnership | Preston, ID 83263 | $7,444 |
31 | Godfrey Properties L C | Clarkston, UT 84305 | $7,118 |
32 | Marilynn T Brown | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $6,618 |
33 | Thompson Family Family Trust | Jackson, WY 83001 | $6,618 |
34 | Thompson Irrevocable Trust-glen W Thompson | Clarkston, UT 84305 | $6,212 |
35 | Trigger Enterprises LLC | Centerville, UT 84014 | $6,185 |
36 | Ludean Larsen | Logan, UT 84321 | $6,079 |
37 | West Hills Estates LLC | Mendon, UT 84325 | $5,480 |
38 | Jack A Buttars | Sandy, UT 84093 | $5,100 |
39 | Marlene A Higgs | Bountiful, UT 84010 | $4,789 |
40 | Ann J Godfrey | Logan, UT 84321 | $4,774 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”