Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,550
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in 2nd District of Utah (Rep. Chris Stewart) totaled $15,543,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Clark Brothers | Cedar City, UT 84721 | $160,883 |
2 | Arlin S Hughes | Veyo, UT 84782 | $124,431 |
3 | Frank D Vincent | Leamington, UT 84638 | $123,965 |
4 | Pearsons Ranch | Minersville, UT 84752 | $120,045 |
5 | Alan K Gurney | Aurora, UT 84620 | $109,276 |
6 | William M Gubler | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $107,909 |
7 | Pace Ranches | Teasdale, UT 84773 | $107,618 |
8 | Brant George | Kanosh, UT 84637 | $107,473 |
9 | Johnson Livestock Oak Ranch | Aurora, UT 84620 | $99,505 |
10 | Wintch Livestock Company | Manti, UT 84642 | $93,425 |
11 | Evans Beefmasters Inc | Enterprise, UT 84725 | $91,813 |
12 | Heaton Livestock Co | Alton, UT 84710 | $89,644 |
13 | Williams Livestock Inc | Cedar City, UT 84720 | $88,374 |
14 | John E Wittwer | Saint George, UT 84790 | $87,079 |
15 | S & W Hall Co Inc | Newcastle, UT 84756 | $85,450 |
16 | Wood Bros | Lyman, UT 84749 | $80,853 |
17 | Security Agrricultural Enterprise | Loa, UT 84747 | $80,411 |
18 | Dean Carter | Minersville, UT 84752 | $80,225 |
19 | Calvin/floyd Yardley | Beaver, UT 84713 | $79,215 |
20 | Reed Carter | Beaver, UT 84713 | $78,779 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>