Total Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 683

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis) totaled $39,186,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
41John Edward Roring And Corinne Nielson Roring FamiOrem, UT 84097$293,769
42J Michael AdamsSouth Jordan, UT 84095$283,088
43Scott RasmussenGilbert, AZ 85297$282,649
44Redd Cattle CompanyMonticello, UT 84535$274,836
45Ian L GetterFlagstaff, AZ 86005$270,574
46Tamara R KnubelSandy, UT 84092$269,240
47John H SkidmoreCortez, CO 81321$267,132
48The Meyer Family TrustW Stockbridge, MA 01266$258,657
49Gary HallsMonticello, UT 84535$254,157
50Val DaltonMonticello, UT 84535$234,077
51J H Ranch Inc DeleteCortez, CO 81321$216,124
52Robert A BarryMonticello, UT 84535$213,853
53Preston T JohnsonBlanding, UT 84511$210,961
54Beth J JarvisPayson, UT 84651$197,553
55Scott A JohnsonMonticello, UT 84535$197,215
56Phyllis S CrowleyMonticello, UT 84535$196,366
57Duncan LivestockFerron, UT 84523$193,375
58Letty Jones Heritage FoundationMonticello, UT 84535$184,180
59Seresa M JohnsonMonticello, UT 84535$182,304
60Blake PetersonMonticello, UT 84535$180,367

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag