Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis), 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 280
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis) totaled $4,534,000 in in 2022.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lasal Livestock | La Sal, UT 84530 | $148,705 |
| 2 | Rainbow Glass Ranch LLC | Orangeville, UT 84537 | $117,875 |
| 3 | Magnuson Livestock LLC | Castle Dale, UT 84513 | $117,875 |
| 4 | Wade K Jensen | Cleveland, UT 84518 | $117,875 |
| 5 | Broken I Ranch, LLC | Blanding, UT 84511 | $95,549 |
| 6 | Nick J Sampinos | Price, UT 84501 | $91,045 |
| 7 | Sacco Brothers Land & Livestock LLC | Helper, UT 84526 | $88,472 |
| 8 | E Leon Mcelprang | Huntington, UT 84528 | $85,659 |
| 9 | Castle Valley Cattle LLC | Emery, UT 84522 | $81,441 |
| 10 | Kenneth E Bates | Moab, UT 84532 | $79,299 |
| 11 | William Marsing Livestock Inc | Price, UT 84501 | $73,910 |
| 12 | Lloyd Shumway | Blanding, UT 84511 | $65,746 |
| 13 | Wm Dale Mathis | Price, UT 84501 | $64,380 |
| 14 | Justus L Jorgensen | Castle Dale, UT 84513 | $64,301 |
| 15 | Nps Holdings | Wellington, UT 84542 | $63,398 |
| 16 | T-n Ranching Company LLC | Price, UT 84501 | $63,183 |
| 17 | Bill Stansfield | Emery, UT 84522 | $61,698 |
| 18 | Lyman Livestock LLC | Salem, UT 84653 | $61,116 |
| 19 | Cameron Jensen | Elmo, UT 84521 | $60,669 |
| 20 | James Allen Staker | Price, UT 84501 | $60,286 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
