Conservation Reserve Program in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 291

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 3rd District of Utah (Rep. John Curtis) totaled $32,207,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
41Scott RasmussenGilbert, AZ 85297$282,649
42Redd Cattle CompanyMonticello, UT 84535$269,696
43Tamara R KnubelSandy, UT 84092$238,508
44John H SkidmoreCortez, CO 81321$236,135
45Ian L GetterFlagstaff, AZ 86005$231,466
46Bruce B AdamsMonticello, UT 84535$230,869
47The Meyer Family TrustW Stockbridge, MA 01266$229,531
48Val DaltonMonticello, UT 84535$223,637
49John Edward Roring And Corinne Nielson Roring FamiOrem, UT 84097$220,635
50J H Ranch Inc DeleteCortez, CO 81321$213,895
51Robert A BarryMonticello, UT 84535$211,453
52Preston T JohnsonBlanding, UT 84511$204,961
53Beth J JarvisPayson, UT 84651$197,553
54Phyllis S CrowleyMonticello, UT 84535$196,366
55Seresa M JohnsonMonticello, UT 84535$182,304
56Letty Jones Heritage FoundationMonticello, UT 84535$179,227
57Lynn J PattersonBlanding, UT 84511$178,518
58Scott A JohnsonMonticello, UT 84535$173,877
59Shirley RamsayMonticello, UT 84535$162,112
60Utorha Land And Cattle LLCBeaverton, OR 97008$158,346

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag