Farm Subsidy information
1st District of Virginia
(Rep. Robert Wittman)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,276
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of Virginia (Rep. Robert Wittman) totaled $195,427,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cloverfield Enterprises | Champlain, VA 22438 | $4,120,577 |
2 | Agri-land | Center Cross, VA 22437 | $3,757,484 |
3 | Philip Minor Farms | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $2,938,786 |
4 | James M Fogg Farms Inc | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $2,652,241 |
5 | Herbert Wilkerson & Son Inc | Colonial Beach, VA 22443 | $2,470,139 |
6 | Harris Farms Inc | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $2,252,816 |
7 | Thomas O Longest Jr | King Queen Ch, VA 23085 | $2,109,012 |
8 | Welch Farms Inc | Kilmarnock, VA 22482 | $1,975,548 |
9 | W H Bray & Sons Incorporated | Urbanna, VA 23175 | $1,956,513 |
10 | Benjamin B Ellis Inc | Champlain, VA 22438 | $1,878,424 |
11 | Philip Minor Farms II | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $1,854,589 |
12 | J & D Carlton Farms Inc | Mattaponi, VA 23110 | $1,846,401 |
13 | David A Hudnall Sr | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $1,834,937 |
14 | Sanford Farms Inc | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $1,711,480 |
15 | Fairview Farms Inc | Kinsale, VA 22488 | $1,664,965 |
16 | C. Wayne And Kenneth A Otto, Dunk | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $1,607,827 |
17 | Bearcroft Farms Inc | Lottsburg, VA 22511 | $1,561,173 |
18 | Brooks Farm LLC | Tappahannock, VA 22560 | $1,542,756 |
19 | Richard M Schools Jr | Saint Stephens Churc, VA 23148 | $1,530,053 |
20 | Haynie Farms LLC | Heathsville, VA 22473 | $1,515,912 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>